Senator Lacson Emphasizes Evidence as Foundation for Flood Control Probe Draft Report
Senate President Pro Tempore Panfilo Lacson has strongly asserted that the draft report and its recommendations from the Senate blue ribbon committee's investigation into the alleged flood control scam remain firmly grounded in the evidence gathered. As the committee chair, Lacson clarified that while Ombudsman Jesus Crispin Remulla, a former lawmaker, understands the political dynamics in Congress, the panel's work is guided by factual findings.
Response to Political Allegations
Lacson's statements come in response to remarks from Remulla, who suggested that revisions to earlier recommendations against certain individuals, including Senators Francis "Chiz" Escudero, Jinggoy Estrada, and Joel Villanueva, might carry political undertones. Lacson countered this by explaining that the changes made to the draft report were purely linguistic adjustments aimed at emphasizing the committee's push for a preliminary investigation before any immediate filing of cases.
He stressed that the essence and content of the report have not been altered; only specific wording was refined to better reflect the panel's intent. According to Lacson, both testimonial and documentary evidence from the hearings served as the primary guide in formulating the recommendations, ensuring a thorough and unbiased approach.
Next Steps for the Draft Report
Before the draft partial report can be presented to the Senate plenary for discussion, it must first secure at least 11 signatures from committee members. This procedural step is crucial to move the investigation forward and maintain transparency in the legislative process. Lacson reiterated that the committee's focus remains on upholding integrity and accountability, with evidence as the cornerstone of their findings.
The investigation into the flood control scam continues to draw attention, highlighting ongoing efforts to address corruption and mismanagement in public infrastructure projects. Lacson's defense underscores the committee's commitment to a fact-based inquiry, free from political interference.
