Cebu Students Split on Alleged Charter Change Proposals
Cebu Students Split on Charter Change Proposals

Students in Cebu have expressed mixed reactions to alleged proposals to amend the 1987 Constitution, following claims raised by Senator Imee Marcos during a plenary session. Several students shared their opinions with SunStar Cebu on Tuesday, May 27, 2026, regarding the supposed constitutional amendments, which reportedly include lowering the minimum age requirement for presidential candidates to 35 years old, extending presidential terms until 2031, and canceling the 2028 presidential elections.

Understanding Charter Change

Charter change, or Cha-cha, is the political and legal process of amending or revising the current 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. It seeks to alter constitutional provisions concerning the structure of the government, term limits, and economic policies. The issue has long been controversial, with supporters arguing it could bring political and economic reforms, while critics warn it may weaken democratic safeguards.

Student Opposition to Amendments

Some students opposed the supposed amendments, arguing that the changes may benefit politicians more than the Filipino public. Gilmar Obiso, a third-year college student, questioned the purpose of charter change, asking whether it is intended for those in the highest positions or for the people. Hans Repalda, a Political Science student from Cebu Normal University, expressed concern that the alleged amendments appear politically motivated rather than aimed at improving the welfare of Filipinos. A student from Cebu Institute of Technology, who requested anonymity, also opposed the alleged proposal to cancel the 2028 presidential elections, stressing the importance of allowing Filipinos to exercise their right to vote.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

Support for Reforms

However, another student believed that constitutional amendments could still bring reforms to the country. The student argued that anyone qualified enough to run for the presidency should be allowed to run, noting that age should not always determine a person's capability to lead. Younger individuals may also be qualified to handle the responsibilities of the presidency, the student added.

Call for Transparency

Despite their differing opinions, the students agreed that any proposed constitutional changes should prioritize the welfare of Filipinos and uphold transparency in governance. The debate over charter change continues to polarize the public, with stakeholders calling for careful consideration of any amendments to ensure they serve the best interests of the nation.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration