ICC Hearings Present Damning Evidence of State-Sanctioned Killings
The recent proceedings at the International Criminal Court have been profoundly difficult to witness. Over the past several days, prosecutors have meticulously presented their case with documented evidence and compelling arguments that cannot be easily dismissed. What has emerged from these hearings goes beyond mere patterns of violence—it reveals the disturbing reality that the systematic killing of suspected criminals, particularly those from impoverished backgrounds accused of drug involvement, was deliberately implemented as official state policy.
The Accused's Own Words Provide Most Damning Evidence
Perhaps the most compelling aspect of the prosecution's case comes not from speculation or hearsay, but directly from the accused's own public statements. The Filipino proverb "Nahuhuli ang isda sa bibig" (The fish is caught by its mouth) proves remarkably accurate in this context. Through his own repeated declarations, the accused effectively incriminated himself, with subsequent street-level violence demonstrating he meant every word he spoke.
His defense team attempted to frame the arrest as politically motivated, but the judges remained focused on the central question: Was he responsible for the deaths of thousands? Attempts to dismiss his statements as jokes, sarcasm, or hyperbole collapsed under the overwhelming weight of evidence, including numerous video recordings of his public addresses.
Key Statements Presented as Evidence:- "Do nationally what I did locally and I will reward you."
- "If they resist arrest, kill them."
- "If you don't, I will kill them myself."
- "Plant evidence if necessary."
- "If you go to prison, I will pardon you."
- "Don't worry about human rights, human rights, I will protect you."
The explicit nature of these statements leaves little room for interpretation—the message was unmistakably clear and direct.
Societal Complicity and Cultural Transformation
Perhaps even more troubling than the accused's words was the enthusiastic response from his supporters. The applause, laughter, approval, and cheering crowds revealed a disturbing transformation within segments of Philippine society. As the victims' lawyer noted, something significant happened to the Filipino people during this period.
Many who were once peace-loving citizens gradually became reflections of their idol, mirroring the very violence they witnessed. Brutality transformed into entertainment, threats became punchlines, and supporters echoed chilling rhetoric through social media trolling on behalf of their leader. This cultural shift represents one of the most painful aspects of the entire situation.
A Nation on Trial Alongside Its Leader
As the hearings progressed, a deeper realization emerged: While the accused chose to remain in his cell and waived his right to appear in court, he does not stand alone in this trial. With him stands an entire nation—not only those who actively applauded and approved, but also those who remained silent, looked away, or knew what was happening yet chose not to speak out, whether from fear or indifference.
Archbishop Soc Villegas captured this sentiment with painful honesty when he addressed applause during a homily: "Palakpak kayo nang palakpak! We squandered EDSA! We have failed. Shouldn't we bow our heads in shame instead?" His words underscore that this moment calls not for celebration but for profound examination of conscience.
The ultimate outcome of this trial remains uncertain, but one truth has become undeniable: We cannot claim ignorance. The international community is watching closely, and alongside the accused, all Filipinos—indeed, all of us—stand collectively on trial for what transpired and how we responded.
