A recent Advent message delivered by priests in the Philippines, calling for a focus on spiritual rather than material preparation for Christmas, has ignited a public debate. While the homily's core message was widely praised, observers have pointed out apparent contradictions in the clergy's own actions, particularly regarding elaborate church decorations and their stance on a political case involving Vice President Inday Sara Duterte.
The Core Message: Spiritual Preparation Over Materialism
In their homilies marking the start of the Advent season, priests emphasized that true preparation for the coming of the Savior should not center on material things like Christmas trees, parties, or gifts. They stressed that self-preparation is what the Lord desires, urging the faithful to focus on inner reflection to make the celebration meaningful. The clergy explicitly stated that elaborate Christmas decorations are not important and do not constitute proper preparation for the holy season.
This guidance has influenced many families, with some opting not to put up decorations in their homes this year. Longtime observers of the tradition, however, have expressed a sense of loss, noting that the absence of lights and ornaments has made the season feel less joyful and festive compared to previous years.
A Contradiction in Practice: The Case of Lavish Church Decorations
Despite the homily's advice against material displays, a notable contradiction has been observed in church practices. In many parishes, priests assign so-called "donors" to fund and install extensive decorations on church grounds. A common practice involves adorning large trees, like acacias, with numerous small, illuminated star-shaped ornaments.
The expectation is often for the trees to be fully covered to create a spectacular visual effect, which entails significant expense and effort for the assigned donors. While these decorations undoubtedly enhance the festive atmosphere of church activities, it raises questions about the alignment between the clergy's words and deeds. Critics ask why, if the message is to avoid material preparation, the church itself engages in and encourages such costly decorative endeavors.
Further Scrutiny: Clergy and Political Commentary
The debate extends beyond decorations into the realm of politics. Recently, a group of activists filed a corruption case against Vice President Inday Sara Duterte. While this is within their rights, the reaction of some priests and members of the clergy has drawn attention.
Some have used their platforms, including social media accounts, to express praise and support for the activists involved in the case, some of whom are reportedly connected to the church. This has been perceived as the clergy endorsing a political action. Observers recall that the Pope has previously reminded priests to avoid direct involvement in political campaigning, as it conflicts with their spiritual duties to the people.
The actions of these clergy members are seen by some as not only contradicting the Pope's guidance but also blurring the line between their religious role and political advocacy. The commentary suggests that if a priest wishes to engage deeply in politics, he should perhaps step away from using the pulpit for such purposes and instead seek electoral office directly, to avoid confusing the faithful about his role as a representative of God.
The situation presents a complex picture for Filipino Catholics this Advent, highlighting a tension between preached ideals and practiced reality within the church community.
