House Human Rights Chair Slams Tiangco Over Unfounded Allegations
House Committee on Human Rights Chairman Bienvenido Abante has launched a sharp critique against Navotas Representative Toby Tiangco, accusing him of repeatedly making baseless accusations against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. and former Speaker Martin Romualdez in relation to budget matters. According to Abante, Tiangco's statements are not only unsubstantiated but also contribute to confusion and division within the political landscape.
Abante's Direct Challenge: Evidence or Silence
In a bold move, Abante challenged Tiangco to present any concrete evidence to back his claims. He emphasized that if Tiangco lacks proof, he should cease his allegations, which Abante described as repetitive and akin to a broken record. This call for accountability underscores the growing frustration over what Abante views as political noise that detracts from substantive governance.
Malacañang Denies Alleged Private Remarks
Adding to the controversy, Malacañang has officially denied reports of any private statements made by President Marcos Jr. against Romualdez. This denial aims to quell speculation and reinforce the administration's stance on the matter, further isolating Tiangco's assertions as unfounded.
Romualdez Cleared by Independent and Senate Bodies
Abante highlighted that Romualdez has been cleared by the Independent Commission on Infrastructure, and no evidence was found against him by the Senate Blue Ribbon Committee, as confirmed by Senator Ping Lacson. Moreover, Abante pointed out that no cases have been filed against Romualdez in key institutions such as the Ombudsman, Department of Justice, or Sandiganbayan, bolstering the argument that the allegations lack merit.
Call for Focus on National Progress
Concluding his remarks, Abante urged fellow lawmakers to abandon political intrigue and instead concentrate on meaningful work for the nation. He stressed the importance of unity and productivity in addressing the country's pressing issues, rather than engaging in divisive rhetoric.
