Witnesses Reveal Alleged Discaya-Romualdez Connection in Senate Flood Control Investigation
In a dramatic turn during the eighth hearing of the Senate Blue Ribbon Committee, two key witnesses have come forward with explosive allegations linking contractor Pacifico "Curlee" Discaya and former House Speaker Martin Romualdez to the ongoing investigation into anomalies surrounding flood control projects. The witnesses, who testified under the aliases "Joy" and "Maria", provided detailed accounts that have intensified scrutiny on the high-profile case.
Testimony Details Property Dispute and Alleged Involvement
The witnesses recounted their experiences working with a certain Rico Ocampo, who previously rented a house in South Forbes Park that was sold in April 2023. According to their testimony, they were advised to vacate the property via an email from a law firm, receiving only a limited grace period until February 3, 2024, to relocate their belongings. This abrupt eviction notice set the stage for their subsequent encounters with key figures in the investigation.
During the Senate hearing, the witnesses explained how a property broker introduced them to a contractor, whom they later identified as Pacifico Discaya after recognizing him from television appearances. They alleged that Discaya took charge of the individuals assisting in their immediate removal from the property, emphasizing that they were operating under a strict deadline. When the witnesses inquired about appealing to the new owner of the house, they were reportedly informed that Martin Romualdez had purchased the asset.
Denials and Broader Implications
In response to these allegations, Pacifico Discaya has vehemently denied any involvement or transactions with the two witnesses. Similarly, Martin Romualdez has previously refuted claims of having any connection or dealings with the Discaya couple, particularly in relation to reports suggesting they were used as fronts for acquiring high-value properties in Makati City. These denials add a layer of complexity to the Senate probe, which continues to unravel potential irregularities in government-funded flood control initiatives.
The testimony has sparked renewed interest in the investigation, highlighting concerns over transparency and accountability in public infrastructure projects. As the Senate Blue Ribbon Committee delves deeper, the implications of these allegations could extend beyond individual reputations, potentially impacting broader political and administrative oversight mechanisms.
