Zaldy Co Confirmed in Sweden, Files for TRO at Supreme Court
Documents submitted to the Supreme Court have confirmed that former Ako Bicol party-list Representative Zaldy Co is currently residing in Nacka, Stockholm, Sweden. The evidence, which includes his signature and identification, was presented as part of his petition against Ombudsman Jesus Crispin Remulla.
Legal Battle Over Graft and Malversation Charges
Co is seeking a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) from the Supreme Court to prevent the implementation of a resolution recommending graft and malversation cases against him. This legal move comes in response to a warrant of arrest issued by the Sandiganbayan in connection with a P289-million flood control project in Naujan, Oriental Mindoro.
According to his lawyers, Co left the Philippines on July 19, 2025, for a medical leave and has not returned due to alleged threats to his life. They argue that his departure was necessary for his safety and well-being.
Constitutional Rights and Due Process Concerns
In his petition, Co asserts that his constitutional rights to due process were violated. He claims he was not given proper notice to submit a counter-affidavit, which he believes is essential for a fair legal proceeding. Additionally, Co contends that the findings of the Independent Commission for Infrastructure are insufficient to warrant charges against him.
This stance contradicts earlier statements by Interior Secretary Jonvic Remulla, who alleged that Co was living in Lisbon, Portugal. The new evidence from Sweden clarifies his current whereabouts and adds a layer of complexity to the ongoing legal and political scrutiny.
Awaiting Response from the Ombudsman
As of now, the Ombudsman's office has yet to respond to Co's request for a TRO. The outcome of this petition could significantly impact the progression of the graft and malversation cases, potentially delaying or altering the legal proceedings.
The case highlights broader issues in Philippine politics, including the challenges of ensuring due process and the international dimensions of legal disputes involving public officials. It also underscores the role of the Supreme Court in adjudicating such high-profile matters.
