Today marks the birth anniversary of Andres Bonifacio, the Father of the Philippine Revolution, sparking renewed discussions about the most effective methods for national change.
The Revolutionary Path of Bonifacio
On November 29, 2025, the Philippines commemorates the legacy of Andres Bonifacio, who together with the Kataastaasang Kagalanggalangang Katipunan ng mga Anak ng Bayan (KKK) chose armed struggle to liberate the country from Spanish colonization.
Bonifacio and the Katipunan ultimately achieved their goal of spreading revolution across the nation, though Bonifacio himself did not live to see the final victory. Despite this, history honors him as the Father of the Revolution for his crucial role in igniting the fight for freedom.
Rizal's Peaceful Resistance
This celebration inevitably raises questions about the preferred method of struggle: armed conflict or peaceful resistance? The debate often centers on the contrasting approaches of Bonifacio and national hero Jose Rizal.
Historical records show that Rizal's writings actually inspired Bonifacio during the early organization of the Katipunan. The two revolutionaries even met personally at one point. However, when revolutionary forces tried to convince Rizal to support their armed movement, he declined.
Rizal refused to endorse armed struggle for two main reasons: he opposed the shedding of Filipino blood, and he believed the revolutionaries lacked sufficient funds and weapons. Instead, Rizal chose writing as his weapon, using his pen to expose Spanish abuses and push for reforms through peaceful means.
Relevance to Modern Philippine Challenges
Both approaches had their merits according to historical context. Rizal's peaceful resistance through writing effectively awakened Filipino consciousness about Spanish oppression. His works slowly built the foundation for revolution, serving as the spark that would eventually ignite the dynamite of rebellion.
When public awareness reached its peak and the situation demanded more direct action, the time had come for Bonifacio's armed resistance. This progression demonstrates that the appropriate method of struggle depends entirely on the specific circumstances.
As the Philippines faces severe corruption in modern times, the same fundamental question arises: which approach is more appropriate today? Should citizens embrace Bonifacio's methods or follow Rizal's path of peaceful reform?
This Bonifacio Day provides an opportunity for Filipinos to reflect on this enduring question while celebrating the birth of a revolutionary hero. The answer may determine the future course of national development and the ongoing fight against systemic corruption.
