The Cebu City Council's vote on April 14, 2026, denying accreditation to ACTIEF Pit-os Campus may appear at first glance as a mere technical decision. It is easy to dismiss it as another chapter in Cebu's long-standing political rivalry—BOPK versus Barug, council factions, and personalities clashing ahead of the 2028 elections. This is familiar territory. Politics is inherent in governance. However, when political maneuvers begin to shape decisions that directly affect students' access to education, the story changes. It is no longer about power; it is about rights.
Constitutional Framework on Education
The Philippine Constitution, particularly the Bill of Rights and social justice provisions, clearly directs the State to prioritize education and make it accessible to all. Not every denial of accreditation is unconstitutional, but decisions that hinder access to education—especially for the poor and those in remote areas—raise serious questions. The issue is not only whether regulations were followed but whether the outcome strengthens or weakens the State's duty to provide education.
Questionable Timing and Motives
The City Council's hasty vote despite deficiencies that could have been corrected invites scrutiny. Was it driven by genuine regulatory discipline, or was it influenced by political calculations? Some argue that postponing the vote to give ACTIEF time to comply while protecting student interests would have been more reasonable. Instead, the outright denial caused confusion and anxiety among students, even if other schools are available.
The Spirit of the Constitution
This is where the "spirit" of the Constitution comes in. Laws and rules are meant to serve the people, not to trap them in situations without consideration of their circumstances. When government becomes so rigid that it loses sight of human impact, it may violate the Constitution. The Bill of Rights does not directly guarantee scholarships, but it upholds the principle that the State must act to promote dignity, fair treatment, and equal opportunity.
Conflict of Interest Concerns
The issue of conflict of interest is also significant. Even if legally defensible, the appearance of personal interest in government transactions erodes public trust. Previous court rulings may provide legal cover, but they do not erase public doubt. Law and morality do not always align; what is legal is not always right.
Students Should Not Be Pawns
Ultimately, students should not become victims of political battles. Regardless of which camp is involved, education must not be used as a bargaining chip. It is a right and a national priority. If there is a lesson to be learned, it is this: the government must strengthen investment in education—not just in regulation but in funding and support. Scholarships and financial aid should be expanded, not held hostage by politics.
