Contractor Curlee Discaya Defies Restitution Demand in Senate Flood Control Probe
In a dramatic turn during the Senate Blue Ribbon Committee hearing on Monday, contractor Curlee Discaya strongly opposed the requirement for restitution to qualify for the Witness Protection Program (WPP). Discaya argued that complying with this demand feels akin to being robbed, as he and others involved in the investigation into alleged multi-billion peso anomalies in flood control projects face scrutiny.
Senate Inquiry into Flood Control Corruption
The hearing, led by Senator Rodante Marcoleta, focused on the ongoing probe into corruption within flood control initiatives managed by the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH). Marcoleta questioned Discaya about the specifics of the restitution request, which is a mandatory condition for contractors and officials seeking to become state witnesses in these cases.
Discaya's response highlighted the contentious nature of the restitution policy, suggesting it places an undue burden on those cooperating with authorities. He emphasized that this requirement could deter individuals from coming forward, potentially hindering the investigation into the massive financial irregularities.
Implications for the Witness Protection Program
Restitution is a key prerequisite under the WPP, designed to ensure that witnesses demonstrate good faith by returning ill-gotten gains. However, Discaya's stance raises questions about its fairness and effectiveness in high-profile corruption cases. His comments underscore the challenges faced by the Senate and the Ombudsman in unraveling the complex web of alleged fraud in public infrastructure projects.
This development adds a new layer to the Senate's efforts to hold accountable those responsible for the flood control anomalies, which have drawn public outrage over wasted taxpayer funds. The investigation continues as authorities seek to uncover the full extent of the corruption and implement reforms to prevent future abuses.
