VP Sara Duterte's Impeachment Response Called 'Non-Answer' by Lawmaker Ridon
VP Sara's Impeachment Reply Labeled 'Non-Answer' by Rep. Ridon

VP Sara Duterte's Impeachment Response Called 'Non-Answer' by Lawmaker Ridon

Bicol Saro Party-list Representative Terry Ridon has sharply criticized Vice President Sara Duterte's camp for what he describes as a "non-answer" in response to a 10-day notice from the House Justice Committee regarding two impeachment complaints filed against her. According to Rep. Ridon, the vice president's reply fails to directly address the allegations contained in the complaints and instead diverts the focus of the discussion.

Allegations of Evasion and Due Process Concerns

Rep. Ridon stated that rather than providing a straightforward answer, Duterte's team has complained about not being given due process. He countered this by emphasizing that the issuance of the notice for comment itself constitutes a clear adherence to the due process requirements mandated by law. This exchange highlights the ongoing tension between the legislative body and the vice president's office over procedural fairness.

Dispute Over Facts and Evidence in Complaints

The lawmaker also addressed the vice president's allegation that the two impeachment complaints lack ultimate facts. Ridon asserted that there is sufficient evidence supporting the accusations against Duterte, including:

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list
  • Anomalous use of confidential funds, which has raised questions about financial transparency.
  • Issues with her Statement of Assets, Liabilities, and Networth (SALN), pointing to potential discrepancies.
  • Unexplained wealth, which remains a contentious point in the allegations.

He noted that the complainants have meticulously presented these claims along with adequate evidence, making the vice president's dismissal of them as baseless unfounded.

Criticism of the Response Strategy

Rep. Ridon further criticized Duterte's camp for opting to provide what he termed an "improper comment" rather than addressing the complaints point by point. He argued that this approach not only undermines the seriousness of the impeachment process but also reflects a deliberate attempt to sidestep accountability. The lawmaker's remarks underscore a broader political struggle, as the House Justice Committee continues to scrutinize the vice president's actions amid mounting public and legislative pressure.

This development comes as the impeachment proceedings gain traction, with stakeholders closely watching how Duterte's team will navigate the legal and political challenges ahead. The outcome could have significant implications for her tenure and the broader political landscape in the Philippines.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration