VP Sara Duterte Files Perjury Case Against Ramil Madriaga Over Impeachment Claims
Duterte Files Perjury Case vs Madriaga Over Impeachment

Vice President Sara Duterte Initiates Perjury Case Against Former Staff Member

In a significant legal move, Vice President Sara Duterte has formally lodged a perjury complaint against Ramil Madriaga at the Taguig City Prosecutor's Office on March 4, 2026. The case centers on allegations that Madriaga, who is currently accused in a kidnapping case, falsely presented himself as a campaign supporter before emerging as a key witness in impeachment proceedings against Duterte.

Background of the Allegations and Impeachment Context

Ramil Madriaga, a former staff member of the Office of the Vice President, submitted an affidavit claiming that Duterte's campaign was funded by drug dealers and Philippine Offshore Gaming Operators (POGOs). This testimony was included in documents filed as part of the third impeachment complaint against the Vice President, which is currently under review by the House Committee on Justice. The impeachment complaint lists six grounds, including alleged plunder, graft, misuse of funds, and threats of murder.

Duterte emphasized that the public should not be misled by fabricated stories, stating that such actions undermine trust in the political process. Her legal representative, Atty. Paolo Panelo Jr., will handle media inquiries related to the case, ensuring transparency and addressing questions about the perjury charges.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

Legal and Political Implications of the Case

The filing of this perjury case highlights the escalating tensions in Philippine politics, as it directly challenges the credibility of evidence used in impeachment efforts. By pursuing legal action, Duterte aims to discredit Madriaga's claims and reinforce her stance against what she describes as baseless accusations. This development could impact the ongoing impeachment proceedings, potentially influencing public opinion and judicial outcomes.

As the case progresses, it will be closely monitored for its effects on political accountability and legal standards in the country. The involvement of high-profile figures like Duterte and Madriaga adds a layer of complexity, making this a pivotal moment in recent political discourse.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration