Lawmakers Condemn VP Sara's Impeachment Response as Evasive Tactics
Several members of the House of Representatives have strongly criticized the consolidated verified answer submitted by Vice President Sara Duterte in response to the impeachment complaints filed against her. They argue that her response fails to address the allegations directly and instead appears designed to have the complaints dismissed on technical grounds.
House Committee on Justice Chair Questions Response Validity
Batangas Representative Gerville Luistro, who chairs the House Committee on Justice, stated that Duterte's submitted answer does not properly respond to the accusations. He characterized it as a general denial that leaves the allegations against her standing without substantive rebuttal. According to Luistro, the vice president's failure to directly counter the issues means the complaints remain valid and unresolved.
Additional Lawmakers Support Criticism of Evasion
La Union Representative Paolo Ortega V and Manila Representative Joel Chua have echoed these concerns, asserting that the vice president is hiding behind procedural technicalities rather than confronting the evidence presented against her. They maintain that this approach undermines the impeachment process and prevents a fair examination of the facts.
Defense Team Alleges Double Standards in Impeachment Process
In a vigorous defense, Duterte's legal team has countered these criticisms by alleging double standards in how impeachment complaints are handled. They point to similar complaints filed against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., claiming that the vice president is being subjected to different treatment and scrutiny. The defense argues that this inconsistency violates principles of fairness and due process.
Questions Raised About Witness Credibility
Furthermore, Duterte's defense team has challenged the credibility of key witness Ramil Madriaga, a former aide who claimed he was instructed to transfer large sums of money for the vice president. They question the reliability and motives behind these allegations, suggesting they lack substantiation and are politically motivated.
The ongoing impeachment proceedings continue to highlight deep political divisions, with both sides preparing for further legal and parliamentary battles as the House Committee on Justice reviews the complaints and responses.
