President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. has firmly dismissed allegations made by former Ako Bicol Party-list Representative Zaldy Co, who claimed the President was the "mastermind" behind controversial P100 billion insertions in the 2025 national budget.
Presidential Response to Serious Allegations
In a strong response to the accusations released on November 15, 2025, President Marcos stated: "I don't want to even dignify what he is saying." This reaction reflects the administration's position that the claims lack substance and credibility. The President's statement suggests the allegations are not worthy of serious consideration or detailed rebuttal.
Public Reaction and Social Media Response
The allegations have sparked diverse reactions across the Philippines, with netizens and the public expressing mixed responses. Some citizens expressed belief in the claims, while others found humor in the situation. Many showed frustration and shock at the serious nature of the accusations involving the national budget.
The controversy raises important questions about the underlying motives behind these revelations. Observers are questioning whether there will be formal investigations launched against the President or if the statements will simply be dismissed as the desperate actions of a former congressman.
Credibility and Evidence Concerns
Critical to this developing story is the need for substantial evidence to support such serious claims. Without strong foundational proof, these allegations risk being categorized as meaningless and merely serving as social media entertainment.
The public awaits potential additional evidence, such as videos or documents that might substantiate the claims. The type of statement made by Co, if lacking solid foundation, could damage not only the President's image but also the credibility of both legislative and executive branches that rely on the integrity of their budgetary processes.
The proper approach to such allegations involves facing due process directly—avoiding intimidation tactics, evasion, or participation in drama that obscures the truth. If evidence exists, it should be presented to appropriate courts or agencies. Without substantiation, such claims should not be allowed to become instruments creating chaos based solely on unverified video content.
The national interest must remain the priority, rather than personal political defense or retaliation in what appears to be an escalating political confrontation.
