A joint statement from civil society groups, mass organizations, and concerned individuals expresses serious concern over the reported plan by the new Senate majority to designate Senator Francis “Chiz” Escudero as the presiding officer of the impeachment court for twice-impeached Vice President Sara Duterte.
Imperfect Options
In a Senate composed of imperfect options, the groups acknowledge the tactical considerations behind this plan. However, they argue that among the available choices, this is perhaps the most imperfect and one of the most dangerous. At a time when the Senate must restore public confidence in its independence and credibility, elevating Escudero to this crucial role risks achieving the opposite.
Past Conduct
The statement recalls Escudero’s conduct during previous impeachment proceedings, where his twisted interpretation of the constitutional directive to proceed “forthwith” became the basis for delay and deferment of the impeachment process.
Legal Background Not Enough
The argument that Escudero is best suited for the role due to his legal background is unconvincing. Legal knowledge alone does not guarantee fairness, impartiality, or fidelity to the spirit of the Constitution. An impeachment trial is not merely a legal exercise; it is a constitutional and political process that demands public trust in the neutrality of those who oversee it.
A Defining Test
The impeachment trial is a defining test for the Senate and for Philippine democracy. It must demonstrate that no public official is above the law and that constitutional accountability cannot be defeated through procedural maneuvering. The Senate owes the Filipino people a process that is fair, credible, and beyond suspicion.
Recommendation
With the issue of the legitimacy of the Senate presidency settled, the groups hope the new Senate majority reconsiders and instead allows Senate President Win Gatchalian to lead as presiding judge and shepherd the impeachment trial to its just conclusion.
